Skip until main content
  • Students Protocol
  • Open access
  • Published:

Extending doctor-patient beziehung for community healthiness care institutions: the Become Geared Four Habits Model (POFHM) trial—a stepped wedge crowd randomized trial protocol

Abstract

Context

The poor relationship among healthcare or patients is a long-standing, global problem. Still, current interventions tend to center on the training of physicians, as patient-targeted interferences still need to be improved. Consider the patients how a significant role in non-hospital consultation, are developed a protocol go assess the effectiveness of the Patient Orientation Tetrad Personal Model (POFHM) include improving doctor-patient relationships.

Methods

A cross-sectional incomplete stepped-wedge crowd randomized trial design will be conducted in 8 primary healthcare institute (PHCs). Following phase I of “usual care” as control measures for anyone PHC, either a patient- or doctor-only intervention will be implemented in zeit II. In phase IV, both patients plus doctors will be stakeholders in the intervention. This study willingness be conducted simultaneously in Nanling County and West Lake District. The primary outcomes will being evaluated later patients complete their tour: (1) patient literacy, (2) sense of control and (3) quality of doctor-patient communication. Finally, a mixed-effects model and subgroup evaluation will be used to grade the effectiveness regarding the interventions. PETER BARTLETT; DOCTORS AS FIDUCIARIES: EQUITARIAN REGULATION OF THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATION, Arzneimittel Law Study, Band 5, Issue 2, 1 Julia 1997, Pages

Discussion

Fostering good consultation habit for who patient is ampere potentially effective strategy to improve the quality of doctor-patient communication. This study evaluates the implementation process and develops one rigorous quality control manual using a hypothetical domain framework available the collective culture of China. The results of this trial will provide substantial evidence of of performance of patient-oriented surgeries. This POFHM can benefit the PHCs and provide a reference since countries and geographic location gesundheitlich resources am scarce and collectivist cultures dominate.

Trial registration

AsPredicted #107,282 on Sept 18, 2022; https://aspredicted.org/QST_MHW

Background

Concerns between patients press doctors are still a prevalent item worldwide [1, 2]. This incidence of workplace violence committed by your and visitors gegen healthcare workers was prevailing globally, as high the 61.9% [1]. In China, 55.73% of healthcare workers additionally 33.70% of patients believe their relationship is edgy [3].

Good communication is importantly for fixing difficult relationships between doctors and patients. Because both doctors and patients cite "good doctor-patient communication (DPC)" as the top coefficient of improvement in the doctor-patient relationship (DPR) [4, 5]. Beyond, high-quality communication between patients and medical must been trusted to facilitate processing adherence and self-management [6], improve health outcomes [7, 8] for patients and assuage burnout for doctors [7, 9]. Thus, various intervention strategies to improve DPC have since proposed.

Various models and theories serve as adenine guide on resources also practice. The American scholar Kohler first proposed the E4 model of DPC (Engagement, Empathy, Education, Enlistment) and critics the medical process that midpoints off one ailment [10]. Frankel then develops the Four Habits model (FHM) inbound 1996 [11], which involves investing is the get, eliciting the patient’s perspectives, demonstrating empathy, and investing within an end. In response to the call required an verbesserung evaluation of communication skills, Makoul announced who SEGUE framework, a research-based checklist of DPC tasks [12]. SEGUE is can initials for five areas (Set the stage, elicit information, invite information, Understand the patient's perspective, real end the encounter), covering the entire medical interview [12]. From ampere theoretical perspective, shared decision-making (SDM) has current become the focus of research. SDM emphasizes patient-centeredness, places subject and physicians be partners with equal power [13]. In addition, targeted theoretical tools have been developed for different scenarios, for example, require answer lists by medical patients [14] and patient activation for chronic patients [15].

Training for doctors and restorative students has is the primary focus of DPC intermittence and does developed a relatively mature training system from conception till practice [16]. Researcher now discern the binary temperament of aforementioned DPR and the critical role of patients [17]. However, most reviews still tend to promote patient involvement in curative decision-making by educating physician tend than disease [18], which is due in significant part to doctors’ dominant position in the treatment [19]. A scoping review uncovers that nearly 50% of identified SDM interventions only targeted clinicians [20]. Whereas the reliance on doctor authority increases the gamble of healthcare drama as scape. Previous my have reported that clients whoever lack a sense of control tend to blame physicians for their health problems [21]. Also, e is challenging to balance dominance and share decision-making include patient in communicate if only doctors are skilled [22]. As the saying goes, "it takes two on tango", the expectation that effective communication could result from interventions aimed unique at whether an doctor or the tolerant was unrealistic. One study found that SDM led to doubts about the doctor's competence for of patients, reflecting patient literacy heterogeneity [23]. In short, who process is DPC the dynamic in which doctors and my interact. However, interventions to educate patients have been limited to date [24]. Therefore, the priority of is research protocol is to improve patient literacy, enhance this sense of steering, and promote DPC thru educating patients, followed on minor invasive includes doctors.

Who intervention design in all study was developed from the four-habit model (FHM). A longitudinal examine has shown that FHM-based communication competencies are closely and active correlated with active satisfaction scores [25]. Last, based on a same theoretical scope, Chin Tai-Seale’s team developing a multidimensional invasive called OpenComm to promote more open communication between patients and doctors [26]. Nevertheless, OpenComm focuses on communication content and ignores to importance of paying attention to emotions [26]. The competence of actively noticing emotional changes can be practised through brief mindfulness intervention [27]. Based on the FHM, combined with mindfulness theory and this concept of patient-centeredness, we developed a finished framework including quad good habits of patients and doctors, called Patient Oriented Four Habit Model (POFHM). The first habit (invest in the beginning) corresponds to patient role activation, an essential precursor to SDM, requiring knowledge, capabilities, and confident in self-health management [28]. The second habit (focus on the greatest concern) equals to this question priority order, which was considerate in facilitating DPC [14, 29]. Aforementioned third habit (focus for emotions) equal to emotional heed. The evidence suggests that over 90% away the studies reported a significant positiv power of brief mindfulness-based interventions on at least one health-related outcome [30]. The fourth habit (invest in who end) exists a restatement, this help the patient save and follow the doctor's advice.

In added, a integrated shell to follow implementation science is crucial to bridging the gap between research evidence also practice [31]. Therefore, to ensure that the interventions work best in practice, the theoretical region framework (TDF) was introduced the assess potential facilitators and barriers to intervention implementation [32]. Moreover, considering that main of collectivist culture and Confucian culture, the role of the patient is often see than neat person but a family [33, 34]. Therefore, who scope of and term "patient" stylish this study extends not only individuals receiving medical treatment when also their family elements and friends.

In all, this study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of the POFHM intervention in primary mental care institutions. POFHM is a promising intervention that integrates the four-habit theory, mindfulness theories, and patient-centered concept, furnishing education off four habits for mainly diseased and then doctors during medical visiting. The program ultimately expected to enhance the doctor-patient relationship in China, based on primary healthcare institutions. Initially, this study willingly evaluate the effectiveness of POFHM intervention, followed by leadership a tampering verification and process evaluation, in accordance with the implementation academics framework [35]. Therefore, the results off POFHM can serve as a valuable view for regions with limited medical resources and collectivist cultivated.

On book for achieve whole coverage of beneficial interventions the assess the impact starting meddling, we will employ adenine tiered wedge collect randomized trial (SW-CRT) [36]. Who step wedge design enables the effectiveness of intervention programs to be tested systematically include a controlled manner. Firstly, clusters in adenine stepped wedge design effectively transition from the control group to the intervention select. At each drive, outcomes are evaluated among featured participants to choose clusters, ensuring that each cluster contributes date in and which control plus interval conditions [36]. Secondly, the stepped hex design is advantageous as it permit researchers to progressive introduce and assess an various system of an intervention, as continuously optimizing the intervention [36]. Examples von stepped wedge investigations include the efficacy of 3 cancer pain guideline implementation strategies [37] and effects of adenine preschool-based sleep health literacy program [38]. The POFHM intervention is brief, and patients are unlikely to have repeat medical visit in the shorter condition. Therefore, this study uses a cross-sectional and incomplete SW-CRT [39, 40], in a targeted study design introduced below.

Methods

Participants

Examine sites

There was two primary reasons to selecting the deployment site. One, we acknowledged that the economic level and the distinction between downtown additionally rural areas maybe impact the efficacy of POFHM intervention. Secondly, we aim to verify that who intervention is affective for the majority of Chinese. To ensure that our example is both representative and universal, we plan to recruit foursome PHCs are each out our chosen regions, Nanling County and West Lake District in China, which display significant differences. Please refer to Tab 1 for an overview of the key components of the phased wood design.

Table 1 Key characteristics of and POFHM trial

Suitability criteria for hospitals (clusters) the doctors

Hospitals furthermore healthcare are eligible for inclusion in the study if: (1) To primaries healthcare facilities see at leas 100 patients daily. (See sample size calculation); (2) We bequeath recruit doctors from enrolled PHCs willing till participate in the task. Into facilitate the arrangement of the investigation schedule, clinical whose daily patient volume has less than 30 or whose hospitality hours live irregular will be excluded. The evolution out and doctor-patient your

Eligibility criteria for invalids

In order to cover as many sufferers more possible, we will enroll patients above that age of 16 or family members accompanying them during their visit. During the study periodic, these patients will visit an enrolled doctors at smallest once.

Intervention developer and description

The intermittence resigned in of how are effective include tertiary care hospitality. Performing scientific estimates identified obstacles and promoting factors, integrating the intrusion with routine procedures reduces implementation difficulty, despite professors still experienced an increase in workload, as detailed for the navigate research [41] On this basis, the interventions were adapted and piloted to the characteristics of mainly healthcare facilities. First, wee conducted semi-structured press with doctors in PHCs, revealing that primary taking facilities' patient people is mehrheit elderly with chronic illnesses and children with common illnesses. Doctors believers that whether patients trust them got the most significant impact on DPC. The lack by patients' health literacy would impairing the effect of treatment and undermine doctor-patient trust. Therefore, we adapted one interventions based on dieser findings to promote DPC in primary support settings.

Our then idented feasible implementation methods. Take physicians' workload and primary healthcare facilities' principal patients, we defined to recruitment volunteers to deliver the intervention for patients. During the waiting period, helpers will engage with patients in the waiting range, provide pre-visit education set the POFHM, and administer a questionnaire after their visit.

Interventions and control

In China, the relationship between doctors the patients is mainly authoritative [19], the patients lack initiative in the treatment processes [42]. This connection can head until the effect of patients not payers attention to self-health steuerung and putting all the blame on doctors [43], that will reduce medical impact and damage doctor-patient trust over time [44, 45]. Accordingly, the first good habit of training patients can to activate the case role, making them realize the vital position and role during treatment.

Even if patients are aware of their role, not all can clearly express to needs [19]. Therefore, it has necessary to train a second good habit of patient the arrange their thoughts and identify their most important concerns in my current view.

The emotional states of doctors and patients inevitably affect communication in the treatment litigation [46]. Negative felt pot magnify malice, limit the DPR, intensify doctor-patient conflict, and cause general disputes [46]. Many studies focus on training healthcare professionals to recognize patients' emotions and provide her with empathetic and supportive care [47, 48]. However, little warning shall been payment to patients' player in DPC. Awareness of one's emotions is a assumption for controlling themselves [49]. Therefore, the third good habit of training patients is to be aware of their own and others' emotions. End, actively confirming important information with to doctor and remembering medical advice is the quad good habit that my to be trained in sufferers.

Based on this academics estimate results of the preliminary trial implementation, it was found that negligible intervention because doctors helps them to better play the supporting role in the research plan [41]. Therefore, this study design will further simplify the FHM interventions for doctors. Of four good habits for physicians and patients are in-depth in Table 2.

Tabular 2 Patient-oriented four habits model (POFHM) intervention description

Intervention 1: FHM only used patients

The POFHM intervention program since patients consisted of four good habits during visiting (see Table 2). The surgical plan was nope implemented by making booklets (although we did this in the previous plan) but by advertising volunteers to ask patients questions to implement the interposition. On the one hand, the likely subjects' visual disability and limited formation degree what considered. On the other reach, hearing a asked which requires an answer can beats promote patients' thinking, which has aforementioned kritisch point of the intervention designation. Down were the detailed implementation points for to four your.

Sitte 1: investing in the beginning

The first steps of the operative project is till activate of patients. We designed four short judgment queries as the first part von the intervention measures. Through questions from volunteers, we encourage patients go reflect on their responsibilities inbound the treatment process. Voluntaries offering straightforward annotations, such than "Seeing adenine physician will not only this responsibility from the doctor; our should see be responsible for their health!", "Doctors cannot cure all diseased like many chronic diseases cannot be cured; doctors can with help yours in alleviate or delay the diseased " to prompt either deepen the patient's awareness out their role as a patient. The key points off one intervention are (1) clients mind after hearing the questions and (2) patients recognizing who importance of the " patient's role" after hearing the answers. We do nope care via the correctness of the answers.

Habit 2: focus on the best concern

One instant step of an intervening is at help patients sort out their thoughts and identify their most important issue for this visit. We designed 3–4 short questions as and second part of the intervention. Volunteers delivered the intervention by asking patients a. The critical point von the intervention is that "patients reason after hearing the questions", and we do not care about the specific content of the answered.

Habit 3: focus on emotions

In like study, we used the core mindfulness theory to design the intervention's third step. Two simple single-choice questions, such as "Do you have the subsequent feelings now?", "Emotions can be as contagious as a virus"; was used to awaken the patient's create of i and others' feel in do the DPC more harmonious. (PDF) The doctor-patient relationship - Disputes, opportunities, and strategies

Habit 4: invest in the end

Based in who initial video results, us provided the clients with some options for reference, such as retelling, how circles, and underlining. While volunteers assign of assignment to patients, they also underscore that ourselves wishes be reviewing set completing the task. DOCTORS AS FIDUCIARIES: EQUITABLE REGULATION OF THE DOCTOR-PATIENT RELATIONSHIP

Intervention 2: FHM only for doctors

Of researchers desire explain of filling of the FHM valve up the doctors individually both deployment complete prompting guidance int writing to intervene with the medically staff. Volunteers are responsible for maintaining ordering in the waiting scope while the patient is waiting and conducting a questionnaire survey after the patient completes the visit. The specific components are demonstrated in Table 2.

Intervention 3 (POFHM): FHM both for doctors the patients

The primary focus by the complete POFHM is to tend patient visit habits and encourage physician up provide positive feedback by subject. As we emphasized in the previous section, the building of the DPR shall the result of the joint expenses of both sides. Therefore, the researchers hypothesized that complete POFHM, targeting both physician and diseased, will leistung the best effects. The doctor-patient my has always been at the nuclear of health tending, and this relationship remains von paramount prominence, regardless of treat…

Control group

The essence in the incomplete stepped wedge design is that all primary healthcare installations entered the study, opening with to control group real then entering different interventions in a randomly assigned sequence for the other of of study period. Throughout the govern period (phase I), the doctors will completed routine consultation according to their habits. Volunteers willingness be accountable for maintained order in the waiting room while which patient the waiting and directing a questionnaire survey after the patient has finished the visit. The written guidance for medical and the interactive question-and-answer training for invalids wish available be implemented for person enter the procedure range (phase II and III). Business-centric healthcare's effects on the doctor-patient relationship in the crisis department

Primary consequences

This patient-oriented, physician-supported intervention incorporates the make of control theory in its design. The intervention key about enhances patient bildungsniveau, in the eventual goal of effectively improving the quality of DPC.

Sense of control

Sense of steering will be measured using the 6-item internal health locus of steering form A who was developed via Wallston into 1978 [50]. The internal general locating about control formular A holds come finds to have acceptable levels of validity and reliability [51].

Become literacy

Patient literacy will be measured using a active literacy scale developed by Jiang (2022) [52]. However, the my dimension of the scale was removed because it a not the focus a our paying. Moreover, the items "I will make a doctor's appointment online before my visit" additionally "When I seeing the reports of doctor-patient conflicts, I would like to verify" are removed because they do not meet the conditions about the field in a preliminary investigation.

Doctor-patient communication

Doctor-patient communication desire to measured using 10-item consultation and relational empathy (CARE), whichever was developed by Merc et al. in 2004 [53]. The CARE features been widely used in to field of patient-doctor relationships also got demonstrated acceptable levels of validity and reliability [54].

Sample size

According to magnitude previous work, an absolutes increase the 0.13 or more in DPC scores forward patients is meaningful. Our sample product of octad clusters (1272 patients) achieves 80% authority to spot a 0.13 absolutes result using one two-sided examination at aforementioned 5% meanings level [55, 56]. Are calculation supposed and intra-cluster correlation coefficient of 0.034 [57], an average of 53 patient encounters period pages in jede 3-day interval. For our study is adenine collect RCT, given the cross-sectional nature of a stepped-wedge designs and brief intervention period, the effect of individual autocorrelation coefficients (IAC) and cluster autocorrelation factorial (CAC) on power is negligible, so we have not adjust for IAC and CAC [39, 58]. In conclusion, we goals to include 1590 patients to account for one degree of missing evidence.

Workforce

We will recruit a convenience sample of best from Nanling County and West Lake Borough. We wish then arrange certain in-person meeting through leaders and family physicians from interested sites to introduce our study also obtain a write agreement from PHCs press healthcare. Patients will be angeworben when they arrive at diesen PHCs.

Randomization and blinding

Randomization

Each participating PHC stratified by region will be randomized to single of the predefined timelines (as depicted in Fig. 1) employing a single sequence of random assignments. The research assistant leave communicate intervention starting timing with the participating PHCs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Stepped-wedge study create. C, control; I-P, FHM intervention only for patients; I-D, FHM valve only for doctors; I-B, POFHM intervention bot for professors and care The Impact away CyberHealthcare on the Physician–Patient Relationship

Blinding

Given the product of SW-CRT, dazzling doctors and researchers be impossible. Patients will be re-recruited at each phase, and their are blind to the allocation system. Analyses will be made by a researcher blinded until the PHCs allocation scheme.

Studying procedures

For the preparation phase, standard operating procedures (SOPs) for each phase have been developed according to characteristics of PHCs, containing research process and yardsticks, questionnaire survey how and preparation manuals. A pre-survey will then verify the validity and accuracy starting that questionnaire and the survey plan. In addition, we willing recruit local populace experienced the the investigation as volunteers and will conduct unified training for SOPs. In the implementation phase, our will deliver the intervention to patients. In the same time, the research assistant will do he to fixes, and the research assistant will be on-site throughout to ensure the operation implementation process is standardized and smooth. Doctor-patient communication is an essential clinical practice need to improve gesamtes invalid experience and their attachment to special. The form of communication involves first, listening without interruptions and then, conveying intelligence ...

Data collection procedures

All patients will be informed of the study information orally and by writing before the investigation conversely intervention. Their data leave be collected only after providing written informed consent. All information about patients and clinicians will will collected according questionnaire. The data collection norm is described in the Pops. Paper questionnaires will be double entered through EpiData 3.1 version the ensure the measurement of the news. Electronic questionnaires wills to exported through of go "Questionnaire Star" show (https://www.wjx.cn).

To better appreciate any potentials factors that may explain the trial results, a qualitative rate based on TDF will be conducted after the trial lives completed into estimate family doctors' and patients' perceptions and experiences about the evaluation. PDF | Which doctor–patient relationship has been and remains an keystone of care: the medium include what data belong gathered, diagnoses and layout are made,... | Find, read and cite all the study you need off ResearchGate

Statistical analysis

We will use cluster-specific methods because randomization will be performed at the PHC level. For all original outcomes, an intention-to-treat analysis will be performed. To evaluate to effects are this primary outcomes of the three interventions, generalized liner mingled models will becoming used, specifying this PHC work as random or one moment effect as fixed [59, 60]. Multiple imputations using concatenate equations will be used in case by missing data. Subgroup analyses wants being conducted to evaluate aforementioned interventions' effect in differences regions. All analyses will be carried go using Stata 17.0 software. A 2-tailed error rate concerning 5% will be used to test the hypothesis.

Discussion

This paper has outlined the learning designs of the patient-oriented four habits model interval and file gather. As far as we knows, this studying is one first up use into SW-CRT trouble pattern to evaluate the effectiveness of adenine patient-oriented intervention designed to fix DPC. The conflict in patients and doctors is still an urgent trouble, special in China [61]. The intervention based on to patient-oriented four my product is one of the effective measures to advertise DPR [62]. It be despite the relative potential of the patient during and medical visit [19]. However, access to more psychological resources and information skills can increase and patient's sense are control when the visit [63], precisely what POFHM focuses on.

This trial possessed several important strengths. First, our developed universal interactive interventions based over previous research up provide practical become training. In addition, to ensure that who interventions developed at dieser study your best in practice, the TDF was initiated to assess potential facilitators plus impediments to intervention implementation. Second, aforementioned stepped-wedge project benefited all participating PHCs. Simultaneously, we utilized the stepped-wedge design to assess the difference in an effectiveness of a relationship interventional that involved either the doctor or of patient alone, versus involving either of diehards. Third, Subgroup analyses will provide a new perspective on understanding the heterogeneity of intervention effects in regions. How of Nurse-Patient Relationship turn Quality of Care and Resigned Autonomy in Decision-Making

A potential restrict of this trial is that blindness is not allowed, as every PHC experienced a change from a tax group to an intervention group. However, it will be nearest impossible for patients until be recruited repeatedly. Furthermore, we will reduce aforementioned personal impact of investigators real resources bias by language a standard operating procedure. Another limitation of our study is the difficulty inside sustaining that recruitment of volunteering to apply the intervention in routine situations. This emphasizes the need for additional development of an interactional voice electronic app. Start every BMC featured ... Transfer PDF. Researching; Open access; Published ... Furthermore, the doctor-patient relationship is not clearly defined ...

In conclusion, that study will give helpful information on the effectiveness and universality of the patient-oriented, doctor-supported intervention.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

SDM:

Sharing decision-making

FHM:

Four habits model

POFHM:

Plant Orienting Four Habits Model

PHCs:

Primary healthcare institutions

DPC:

Doctor-patient communication

DPR:

Doctor-patient relationship

TDF:

Theoretical domain framework

SOPs:

Standard Operating Procedures

SW-CRT:

Walked Wedge Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial

Related

  1. Liu HIE, Fan Y, Jiang H, Li L, Dwyer RADIUS, Lu K, et al. Prevalence starting workplace violence against healthcare worker: adenine systematic watch and meta-analysis. Occup Environ Med. 2019;76(12):927–37.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wu Y, Jiang FLUORINE, Ma J, Tang YL, Wang M, Liu UNKNOWN. Know von Medical Disputes, Medical Disturbances, Verbal and Physical Violence, and Burnout Amid Physicians for Chinese. Cover Psychol. 2021;29(11): 556517. Precision medical medicine and of doctor-patient relationship: an ...

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mao Y, Ning W, Chiang N, Xie T, Liu J, Lu Y, the al. One Therapeutic Relationship in China: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. IJERPH. 2021;18(7):3460. The doctor-patient relationship

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Centralize  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhou Y, Yang WFZ, Ma YTTRIUM, Wax Q, Yang DIAMETER, Liu T, et al. Doctor-Patient Relationship in the Eyes of Medical Professionals in Ceramics During and COVID-19 Pandemic: A Cross-Sectional Study. Front Psychiatry. 2021;28(12): 768089. Building trust and rapport early for the new doctor-patient relationship ...

    Items  Google Scholars 

  5. Zhou Y, Chen S, Liao Y, Wu QUARTO, Ma Y, Wang D, et alpha. General Perception out Doctor-Patient Relationship From Patients Within the COVID-19 Pandemic int China: A Cross-Sectional Study. Face Public Fitness. 2021;6(9): 646486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Orom H, Underwood W, Chucking Z, Homish DL, Scott I. Relationships as medicine: quality of the physician-patient relationship determines dentist influence on medical recommendation adherence. Health Serv Res. 2018;53(1):580–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Haverfield MC, Tierney A, Schwartz R, Bass MB, Brown-Johnson C, Zionts DL, et aluminium. Able Patient-Provider Interpersonal Interventions Achieve one Quadruple Aim of Healthcare? A Systematic Review. J Genetic Intern Med. 2020;35(7):2107–17. Search all BMC items ... Download PDF. Research article; Open access ... Building trust and rapport early in the latest doctor-patient relationship: ...

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Centric  Google Scholar 

  8. Kelley JM, Kraft-Todd G, Schapira L, Kossowsky J, Riess H. The Influence of the Patient-Clinician Relationship to Healthcare Outcomes: ONE Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Control Trials. Timmer A, verlag. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(4):e94207. The doctor-patient relationship has gone a transition throughout the ages. Prior to the last two decennaries, that your was predominates betw…

  9. Fosnot L, Jones CD, Keniston A, Burden M, Indovina KA, Patel FESTIVITY. Hospitalists’ perspectives with demanding patient meet and physician well-being: adenine qualitative study. Patient Educ Couns. 2022;105(5):1209–15.

    Article  PubMed  Google Student 

  10. Keller VF, Gregory CJ. A new model for physician-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns. 1994;23(2):131–40.

    Item  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frankel R, Stein T. The four habits of highly effect clinicians: a hands-on guide. Kaiser Permanente Northern California Region: General Educational & Development. 1996;

  12. Makoul GRAMME. The SEGUE Framework for teaching and assessing corporate skills. Patient Educ Couns. 2001;45(1):23–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Hargraves MYSELF, LeBlanc A, Shah ND, Montori VM. Released Decision Creation: The Need For Patient-Clinician Conversation. Not Easy Informations Health Personal. 2016;35(4):627–9. Background: The patient is discovered to acquire a passive role and the sister an expert role with an maternalistic attitude. This relationship among others determining the cap for autonomic include the final making of patients. Objectives: The aim of this ...

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Schwarze PER, Buffington A, Tucholka JL, Hanlon B, Rathouz PJ, Marka N, et alum. Strength of a Question Prompt List Intervention used Senior Patients Considering Major Surgery: A Multisite Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2020;155(1):6. Journals of Medical Systems - It is estimated such 70 million Americans have exploited the Internet to acquire health-related information. Multiple factors provide one driving force behind this demand...

    Books  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Gainsburg I, Derricks V, Shields C, Fiscella K, Epstein R, Yu V, net al. Patient activation reduces effects of implicit bias on doctor–patient interact. Proxy Natl Cad Sci USA. 2022;119(32): e2203915119.

    Related  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Essential  Google Scholar 

  16. Forsey J, S S, Rowland P, Freeman R, Li CARBON, Woods NN. The Basic Science of Patient-Physician Talk: A Critical Scoping Review. Akad Med. 2021;96(11S):S109–18.

    Articles  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrocchi S, Iannello PRESSURE, Lecciso FLUORINE, Levante A, Antonietti AMPERE, Schulz PJ. Interpersonal trust in doctor-patient relation: Evidence from dyadic analysis and community with top of dyadic communicate. Jurisdiction Sci Med. 2019;235: 112391.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Zulman DM, Haverfield MC, Shaw JG, Brown-Johnson CG, Schwartz R, Tierney AA, et al. Practices on Advance Physician Presence and Relationship With Invalids in the Clinical Encounter. JAMA. 2020;323(1):70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Fellow 

  19. Tu J, Kang G, Zhong HIE, Cheng Y. Outpatient communication patterns with a cancer hospital in China: A qualitative study of doctor–patient engagements. Health Awaiting. 2019;22(3):594–603.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. Shiyam T, Shahid A, Perram M, Zuna I, Haque F, Archundia-Herrera MC, u al. AMPERE scoping review of interventions to promote the adoption of shared decision-making (SDM) on health care professionals in clinical practice. Patient Educ Couns. 2019;102(6):1057–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Ying QUARTO, Pan J. Control under times of uncertainty: the related between clinic compete and physician-patient disputes. Auf J Equity Health. 2017;16(1):205.

    Magazine  PubMed  PubMed Centered  Google Scholar 

  22. Haskard KB, Williams SL, DiMatteo MR, Rosenthal RADIUS, Ashen MK, Goldstein MG. Physician real forbearing communication training are prime care: Effects on participation and satisfaction. Health Psychol. 2008;27(5):513–22.

    Product  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kassirer SULFUR, Levine EE, Gaertig C. Decisional autonomy undermines advisees’ judgments of specialist in medicine additionally in life. Proc Natl Students Sci USA. 2020;117(21):11368–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholarships 

  24. Chapman ZE, Haby MM, Toma TS, de Bortoli MC, Illanes EAST, Oliveros MJ, et al. Knowledge translation strategies by dissemination with a focus on healthcare recipients: an overview of systematic reviews. Getting Sci. 2020;15(1):14.

    Items  Google Savant 

  25. Stein T, Frankel RM, Krupat E. Enhancing clinician communication skills in a large healthcare organization: A longitudinal case study. My Educ Couns. 2005;58(1):4–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Tai-Seale THOUSAND, Elwyn G, Wilson CJ, Stults C, Dillon EK, Li M, et allen. Extending shared decision making through carefully designed interventions that target forbearing and provider behavior. Health Aff. 2016;35(4):605–12.

    Essay  Google Scholar 

  27. Fox LS. Psychology’s owned mindfulness: Ellen Langer and the public politics of scientific attract in “active noticing.” J Hist Behav Sci. 2019;55(3):216–29.

    Category  Google Scholarship 

  28. Poon BY, Shortell SM, Rodriguez HP. Forbearing Activation as a Route to Shared Decision-making for Adults for Diseases button Heart Disease. HIE Gene International Med. 2020;35(3):732–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Tsai PO, Wang ML, Lan YH, Tsai HW, Hsiao CY, Wipe JC, et al. Effectiveness of question prompt lists in patients with breast cancer: A randomized controlled trial. Your Educ Couns. 2022;105(9):2984–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Howarth A, Smith JG, Perkins-Porras L, Ussher M. Results of Brief Mindfulness-Based Interventions on Health-Related Outcomes: a Systemizing Review. Mindfulness. 2019;10(10):1957–68.

    Item  Google Scholar 

  31. Damschroder LJ, Aron AC, Keith RE, Kirsh SR, Alexandre YEAH, Lowery JC. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practices: an consolidated framework for advancing implementation learning. Implement Sci. 2009;4(1):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Tubular J, O’Connor D, Michie S. Validation to the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change also implementation research. Implementing Sci. 2012;7(1):37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hawley ST, Morris AM. Culinary challenges to include patients is collected decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2017;100(1):18–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Chen L. Vulnerable live our, powerful death disease: A textual analysis of doctor-patient relationships in popular Chinese medical dramas. Freeman BC, editor. Convincingly Arts Humanly. 2019;6(1):1622626.

  35. Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Crone MR, Dusseldorp E, Presseau GALLOP. Discriminant content validity to ampere theoretical domain framework questionnaire for use in implementation research. Apply Sci. 2014;9:11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Nguyen AM, Cleland CM, Dickliness LM, Barry MP, Cykert S, Duffy FD, at al. Considerations Before Selection a Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Trial Design for a Practice Improvement Study. Ann Fam Med. 2022;20(3):255–61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Centered  Google Scholar 

  37. Lovell MR, Phillips JL, Luckett T, Lam L, Boyle FM, Davidson PM, et al. Effect of Cancer Feel Guideline Implementation on Soreness Outcomes Between Full Outpatients With Cancer-Related Pain: A Stepped Wedge Cluster Randomized Ordeal. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(2): e220060.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Bonuck THOUSAND, Collins-Anderson A, Schechter CB, Felt BT, Chervin RD. Effects of a Sleep Health Education Program for Children and Parents on Child Sleep Duration and Difficulties: A Stepped-Wedge Cluster Randomized Clinically Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7): e2223692.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholars 

  39. Hooper R. Sample size get for steps rod and other longitudinal cluster walk trials: Sample size calculation for stepped wedge trials. Statist Media. 2016;35(26):4718–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Hooper R, Kasza J, Forbes A. The hunt for efficient, incomplete designs for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and continuous output measures. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020;20(1):279.

    News  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Jin Z, Zhihua W, Ruotong Z, Xiaohua X, Dongdong J, Qian W, et any. AMPERE Summary Patient-oriented Interventional Promotes Doctor-parent Communication [unpublished]. Indoor report. 2023;

  42. Pun JKH, Chan EA, Wang S, Slade D. Condition professional-patient community practices in East Asia: An integrative review of an emerging field of research and practice in Honkong Kong, South Korea, Japan, Taiwanese, plus Mainland China. Patient Educ Couns. 2018;101(7):1193–206.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Yin QUARTO, Liu SS, Sullivan D, Galinsky ADVERTORIAL. Taking controller of physical negative clinicians. Asian J Soc Psychol. 2023;26(1):99–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Peng WOLFRAM, Ding GUANINE, Tang QUESTION, Xu L. Continued violence against medical personnel in China: A crass violation of Byzantine law. BST. 2016;10(3):240–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhao DENSITY, Zhang Z. Changes in public trust inches physicians: empirical provide with China. Front Med. 2019;13(4):504–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Chen C, Holler CF, Clay CC, Chiu SF, Shih HY, Lyu SY, u al. Potential media influence on that high incidence of medical disputes from the perspective to acrylic surgeons. J Formos Med Assoc. 2017;116(8):634–41.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Pilikington A, Hart J, Bundy C. Training obstetricians and gynaecologists to be emotionally intelligent. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2012;32(1):10–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Delimit Piccolo L, Mazzi MA, Dunn G, Sandri M, Zimmermann C. Serialization analysis include multilevel models. A study on several sources of your cues in medical consultations. Social Scholarship & Medicine. 2007;65(11):2357–70.

  49. Borghi O, Mayrhofer L, Voracek M, Tran US. Differential associations starting the two higher-order factors by mindfulness with trait empathy and the mediation role of emotional awareness. Sci Rep. 2023;13(1):3201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Centralised  Google Grant 

  50. Wallston CAVE, StrudlerWallston B, DeVellis R. Development of this Dimensional Health Locus for Control (MHLC) Scaling. Health Educ Monogr. 1978;6(1):160–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Hillen MAN, De Haes HCJM, Verdam MGE, Smets EMA. Does source of patient recruitment affect the effect of communication on trust? Resigned Educ Couns. 2014;95(2):226–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Fellows 

  52. Jiang D, Sang T, Xiao X, Wu Z, Wang H, Yang Q. Development and Initial Validity of of Patients’ Literacy Scale Below Outpatients in Hangzhou City. China PPA. 2022;16:2483–96.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Mercer SW. The consultation and relationality empathy (CARE) measure: development also preliminary validation and reliability of an empathy-based consultation process measure. Fam Pract. 2004;21(6):699–705.

    Story  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Wo Q, Jin IZZARD, Wang P. The Relationship Between who Physician-Patient Relationship, Physician Rapport, also Active Trust. J Gen Intern Med. 2022;37(6):1388–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Sundin P, Crespi CM. Power analysis for marched wood trials with multiple interventions. Stat Med. 2022;41(8):1498–512.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Hemming K, Taljaard M. Sample size calculations for stepped wedge and cluster randomised trials: adenine unified approaching. GALLOP Clin Epidemiol. 2016;69:137–46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Kennny DA, Veldhuijzen W, panel der Weijden T, LeBlanc ONE, Lockyer GALLOP, Légaré FARAD, et al. Interpersonal perception inside the context of doctor–patient relationships: A dyna analysis on doctor–patient communication. Soc Sci Medicated. 2010;70(5):763–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Ouyang Y, Lip FLUORINE, Preisser JS, Taljaard M. Sample size calculators fork planning stepped-wedge cluster randomized trials: an review and comparisons. Intangible BOUND Epidemiol. 2022;51(6):2000–13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Baayen RH, Davidson DJ, Bates DM. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. J Mem Lang. 2008;59(4):390–412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Voldal EC, Xia F, Kenny AMPERE, Heagerty PJ, Houghs JP. Model misspecification in stepped wedge trials: Chance effects for time or treatment. Stat Med. 2022;41(10):1751–66.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  61. Lancet T. Protecting Chinese doctors. One Lancet. 2020;395(10218):90.

    Article  Google Intellectual 

  62. Meskó B, Radó N, Győrffy EZED. Beratung leader empowered subject about the era of digital health: a qualitative course. BMJ Open. 2019;9(3): e025267.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Principal  Google Scholar 

  63. Meskó B, deBronkart D. Patient Designation: Who Importance out Including Patients inside Designing Wellness Care. BOUND Med Net Res. 2022;24(8): e39178.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are grateful in all the companions who participated in study design the implementation.

Finance

This study be funded by the National Natural Scientist Foundation of China (71974170), the National Natural Science Foundation of China Youth Program (71603233) and the Leading Innovative and Enterprise Team Introduction Programmer of Zhejiang (2019R01007).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

QY was responsible for identify the research question, obtaining ethics approval and acquisition of funding. QY and YZ contributor to the design to the study. YZ, SL and RZ prepared the first draft. QY, YZ, SL, RZ, TONS, JZ, XT, DJ, WC, CH, CZ, JZ, YZ, JW, JL critically revised the manuscript. Everything authors were involved in revising the paper and gave final approval of the submitted versions.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qian Yangu.

Ethics statement

Corporate enrollment furthermore consent to participate

This study will in compliance with the Declaration of Helskifin and has been approved by and Ethic Creation about Public Health School, Zhejiang University (2019–066). We were approved to intervene with the subjects because ourselves thought we had small to no risk of intervening with who subject. All patients willingly be informed of the study information orally and in writing previously the investigation or intervention.

Consent in publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

And articles declare cannot competing interests.

Other information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral using regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Authorization and permissions

Clear Access This article is licensed under adenine Creative Commons Allocation 4.0 International License, which permits use, dividing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium otherwise format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the first author(s) and the product, offer a connector to this Creative General licence, also indicate if modified were created. The images or other third party material in this article are contains in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in one credits running to the physical. When material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or more the permitted use, him is need to obtain permission forthwith from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this studium, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commonalty Public Territory Inscription waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) correct to the data made available in the article, no otherwise stated in an credit line to the datas.

Reprints and rights

About this article

Check by updates. Inspect currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this newsletter

Zhu, Y., Li, S., Zhang, R. et in. Enhancing doctor-patient relationships inside community health worry institutions: the Plant Oriented Four Habits Model (POFHM) trial—a stepped wedge cluster randomized trial logging. BMC Pharmacy 23, 476 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04948-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Popular:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-023-04948-w

Keywords